Artificial intelligence development races in heterogeneous settings | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

  • Lauren
  • February 2, 2022
  • Comments Off on Artificial intelligence development races in heterogeneous settings | Scientific Reports – Nature.com

1.Taddeo, M. & Floridi, L. Regulate artificial intelligence to avert cyber arms race. Nature 556(7701), 296–298 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
2.Armstrong, S., Bostrom, N. & Shulman, C. Racing to the precipice: A model of artificial intelligence development. AI Soc. 31(2), 201–206 (2016).
Google Scholar 
3.Cave, S. & ÓhÉigeartaigh, S. An AI race for strategic advantage: rhetoric and risks. In AAAI/ACM Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Ethics and Society 36–40, (2018).4.Future of Life Institute. Autonomous Weapons: An Open Letter from AI & Robotics Researchers (Technical report, Future of Life Institute, 2015).5.Future of Life Institute. Lethal autonomous weapons pledge. https://futureoflife.org/lethal-autonomous-weapons-pledge/, (2019).6.Brooks, R. The Seven Deadly Sins of Predicting the Future of AI, (2017). https://rodneybrooks.com/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-predicting-the-future-of-ai/; Online posted 7-September-2017.7.Declaration, Montreal. The montreal declaration for the responsible development of artificial intelligence launched. https://www.canasean.com/the-montreal-declaration-for-the-responsible-development-of-artificial-intelligence-launched/, (2018).8.Steels, L. & Lopez de Mantaras, R. The barcelona declaration for the proper development and usage of artificial intelligence in Europe. AI Commun. (Preprint):1–10, (2018).9.Russell, S., Hauert, S., Altman, R. & Veloso, M. Ethics of artificial intelligence. Nature 521(7553), 415–416 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
10.Jobin, A., Ienca, M. & Vayena, E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.European Commission. White paper on Artificial Intelligence – An European approach to excellence and trust (Technical report, European Commission, 2020).12.Perc, M., Ozer, M. & Hojnik, J. Social and juristic challenges of artificial intelligence. Palgrave Commun. 5(1), 1–7 (2019).
Google Scholar 
13.Sotala, K. & Yampolskiy, R. V. Responses to catastrophic AGI risk: A survey. Physica Scripta 90(1), 018001 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
14.Pamlin, D. & Armstrong, S. Global Challenges: 12 Risks that Threaten Human Civilization (Global Challenges Foundation, 2015).
Google Scholar 
15.O’neil, C. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown (2016).16.Armstrong, S., Sotala, K. & Ó hÉigeartaigh, S. The errors, insights and lessons of famous AI predictions-and what they mean for the future. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell. 26(3), 317–342 (2014).
Google Scholar 
17.Collingridge, D. The Social Control of Technology (St. Martin’s Press, 1980).
Google Scholar 
18.Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., Santos, F. C. & Lenaerts, T. To regulate or not: A social dynamics analysis of an idealised AI race. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 69, 881–921 (2020).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
19.Santos, F. C., Pacheco, J. M. & Lenaerts, T. Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103(9), 3490–3494 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Ohtsuki, H., Hauert, C., Lieberman, E. & Nowak, M. A. A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks. Nature 441(7092), 502–505 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Santos, F. C., Santos, M. D. & Pacheco, J. M. Social diversity promotes the emergence of cooperation in public goods games. Nature 454, 214–216 (2008).ADS 

Google Scholar 
22.Perc, M. et al. Statistical physics of human cooperation. Phys. Rep. 687, 1–51 (2017).ADS 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
23.Chen, X., Sasaki, T., Brännström, Å. & Dieckmann, U. First carrot, then stick: How the adaptive hybridization of incentives promotes cooperation. J. R. Soc. Interface 12(102), 20140935 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Perc, M. & Szolnoki, A. Coevolutionary games—A mini review. BioSystems 99(2), 109–125 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
25.Page, K. M., Nowak, M. A. & Sigmund, K. The spatial ultimatum game. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 267(1458), 2177–2182 (2000).CAS 

Google Scholar 
26.Szolnoki, A., Perc, M. & Szabó, G. Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109(7), 078701 (2012).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
27.Te, W., Feng, F., Zhang, Y. & Wang, L. Adaptive role switching promotes fairness in networked ultimatum game. Sci. Rep. 3, 1550 (2013).
Google Scholar 
28.Santos, F. P., Pacheco, J. M., Paiva, A. & Santos, F. C. Structural power and the evolution of collective fairness in social networks. PLoS ONE 12(4), e0175687 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
29.Cimpeanu, T., Perret, C. & Han, T. A. Cost-efficient interventions for promoting fairness in the ultimatum game. Knowl. Based Syst. 233, 107545 (2021).
Google Scholar 
30.Kumar, A., Capraro, V. & Perc, M. The evolution of trust and trustworthiness. J. R. Soc. Interface 17(169), 20200491 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Schilling, M. A. & Phelps, C. C. Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Manag. Sci. 53(7), 1113–1126 (2007).MATH 

Google Scholar 
32.Newman, M. E. J. Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101(suppl 1), 5200–5205 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Barabasi, A.-L. Linked-how Everything is Connected to Everything Else and what it Means F (Perseus Books Group, 2014).
Google Scholar 
34.Ahuja, G. Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Adm. Sci. Q. 45(3), 425–455 (2000).
Google Scholar 
35.Shipilov, A. & Gawer, A. Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Acad. Manag. Ann. 14(1), 92–121 (2020).
Google Scholar 
36.Barabási, A.-L. & Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439), 509–512 (1999).ADS 
MathSciNet 
PubMed 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
37.Santos, F. C., Pacheco, J. M. & Lenaerts, T. Evolutionary dynamics of social dilemmas in structured heterogeneous populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 3490–3494 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Szabó, G. & Fáth, G. Evolutionary games on graphs. Phys. Rep. 446(4–6), 97–216 (2007).ADS 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
39.Pastor-Satorras, R. & Vespignani, A. Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86(14), 3200 (2001).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
40.Pacheco, J. M. & Santos, F. C. The messianic effect of pathological altruism. Pathological Altruism. pp. 300–310. (New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press, 2012).
Google Scholar 
41.Santos, F. P., Pacheco, J. M., Paiva, A. & Santos, F. C. Evolution of collective fairness in hybrid populations of humans and agents. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33, 6146–6153, (2019).42.Paiva, A., Santos, F., & Santos, F. Engineering pro-sociality with autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 32, (2018).43.Cardillo, A. & Masuda, N. Critical mass effect in evolutionary games triggered by zealots. Phys. Rev. Res. 2(2), 023305 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
44.Scherer, M. U. Regulating artificial intelligence systems: Risks, challenges, competencies, and strategies. SSRN Electron. J. 29, 353 (2015).
Google Scholar 
45.McKinney, S. M. et al. International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening. Nature 577(7788), 89–94 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
46.Rolnick, D. et al. Tackling climate change with machine learning, (2019). Preprint available at arXiv:1906.05433.47.Ranjbar-Sahraei, B., Bou Ammar, H., Bloembergen, D., Tuyls, K., & Weiss, G. Evolution of cooperation in arbitrary complex networks. In AAMAS’2014, 677–684, (2014).48.Denicolò, V. & Franzoni, L. A. On the winner-take-all principle in innovation races. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 8(5), 1133–1158 (2010).
Google Scholar 
49.Campart, S. & Pfister, E. Technological races and stock market value: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 23(3), 215–238 (2014).
Google Scholar 
50.Lemley, M. The myth of the sole inventor. Mich. Law Rev. 110, 709–760 (2012).
Google Scholar 
51.Abbott, F. M., Dukes, M. N. G. & Dukes, G. Global Pharmaceutical Policy: Ensuring Medicines for Tomorrow’s World (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2009).
Google Scholar 
52.Burrell, R. & Kelly, C. The covid-19 pandemic and the challenge for innovation policy. Available at SSRN 3576481, (2020).53.Andrews, T. M., Delton, A. W. & Kline, R. High-risk high-reward investments to mitigate climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 8(10), 890–894 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
54.Baum, S. D. On the promotion of safe and socially beneficial artificial intelligence. AI Soc. 32(4), 543–551 (2017).
Google Scholar 
55.Geist, E. M. It’s already too late to stop the AI arms race: We must manage it instead. Bull. Atom. Sci. 72(5), 318–321 (2016).
Google Scholar 
56.Shulman, C. & Armstrong, S. Arms control and intelligence explosions. In 7th European Conference on Computing and Philosophy (ECAP), Bellaterra, Spain, July, 2–4, (2009).57.Vinuesa, R. et al. The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the sustainable development goals. Nat. Commun. 11(233), 1–10 (2020).
Google Scholar 
58.Askell, A., Brundage, M., & Hadfield, G. The Role of Cooperation in Responsible AI Development. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.04534, (2019).59.Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., & Lenaerts, T. Modelling and influencing the AI binding war: a research agenda. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM conference AI, Ethics and Society, 5–11, (2019).60.Han, T. A., Pereira, L. M., Lenaerts, T. & Santos, F. C. Mediating artificial intelligence developments through negative and positive incentives. PLoS ONE 16(1), e0244592 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
61.Han, T. A., Lenaerts, T., Santos, F. C., & Pereira, L. M. Voluntary safety commitments provide an escape from over-regulation in AI development. Technology in Society (In Press), (2022).62.Perc, M., Gómez-Gardenes, J., Szolnoki, A., Floría, L. M. & Moreno, Y. Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: A review. J. R. Soc. Interface 10(80), 20120997 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Han, T. A. Lynch, S., Tran-Thanh, L. & Santos, F. C. Fostering cooperation in structured populations through local and global interference strategies. In IJCAI-ECAI’2018, 289–295, (2018).64.Raghunandan, M. A. & Subramanian, C. A. Sustaining cooperation on networks: an analytical study based on evolutionary game theory. In AAMAS, Vol. 12, 913–920 (Citeseer, 2012).65.Perc, M. The social physics collective. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–3 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
66.Wilder, B., Immorlica, N., Rice, E., & Tambe, M.. Maximizing influence in an unknown social network. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-18), (2018).67.Bloembergen, D., Sahraei, B. R., Bou-Ammar, H., Tuyls, K. & Weiss, G. Influencing social networks: an optimal control study. In ECAI, Vol. 14, 105–110, (2014).68.Cimpeanu, T., Han, T. A., & Santos, F. C. Exogenous rewards for promoting cooperation in scale-free networks. In Artificial Life Conference Proceedings, 316–323 (MIT Press, 2019).69.Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. Risk of collective failure provides an escape from the tragedy of the commons. PNAS 108(26), 10421–10425 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Pacheco, J. M., Traulsen, A. & Nowak, M. A. Coevolution of strategy and structure in complex networks with dynamical linking. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 258103 (2006).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
71.Tkadlec, J., Pavlogiannis, A., Chatterjee, K. & Nowak, M. A. Fast and strong amplifiers of natural selection. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 1–6 (2021).
Google Scholar 
72.Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. A new route to the evolution of cooperation. J. Evol. Biol. 19(3), 726–733 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
73.Traulsen, A., Nowak, M. A. & Pacheco, J. M. Stochastic dynamics of invasion and fixation. Phys. Rev. E 74, 11909 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
74.Santos, F. C., Pinheiro, F. L., Lenaerts, T. & Pacheco, J. M. The role of diversity in the evolution of cooperation. J. Theor. Biol. 299, 88–96 (2012).ADS 
MathSciNet 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
75.Zisis, I., Di Guida, S., Han, T. A., Kirchsteiger, G. & Lenaerts, T. Generosity motivated by acceptance—Evolutionary analysis of an anticipation games. Sci. Rep. 5(18076), 1–11 (2015).
Google Scholar 
76.Rand, D. G., Tarnita, C. E., Ohtsuki, H. & Nowak, M. A. Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous ultimatum game. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 2581–2586 (2013).ADS 
MathSciNet 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
77.Grujić, J. & Lenaerts, T. Do people imitate when making decisions? Evidence from a spatial prisoner’s dilemma experiment. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7(7), 200618 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
78.Pinheiro, F. L., Santos, F. C. & Pacheco, J. M. How selection pressure changes the nature of social dilemmas in structured populations. New J. Phys. 14(7), 073035 (2012).ADS 

Google Scholar 
79.Ohtsuki, H., Nowak, M. A. & Pacheco, J. M. Breaking the symmetry between interaction and replacement in evolutionary dynamics on graphs. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98(10), 108106 (2007).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
80.Dorogovtsev, S. Complex Networks (Oxford University Press, 2010).MATH 

Google Scholar 
81.Newman, M. E. J. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev. 45(2), 167–256 (2003).ADS 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
82.Albert, R. & Barabási, A.-L. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47–97 (2002).ADS 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
83.Dorogovtsev, S. N., Mendes, J. F. F. & Samukhin, A. N. Size-dependent degree distribution of a scale-free growing network. Phys. Rev. E 63(6), 062101 (2001).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 

Source: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-05729-3